Truth, Demonstration and Knowledge: A Classical Solution to the Paradox of Knowability∗
نویسنده
چکیده
After introducing semantic anti-realism and the paradox of knowability, the paper offers a reconstruction of the anti-realist argument from understanding. The proposed reconstruction validates an unrestricted principle to the effect that truth requires the existence of a certain kind of “demonstration”. The paper shows that that principle fails to imply the problematic instances of the original unrestricted feasible-knowability principle but that the overall view underlying the new principle ∗An earlier version of the material in this paper has been presented in 2005 (no typo!) at the Friday Seminar (University of St Andrews), where Philip Ebert gave a valuable response. I would like to thank that audience for a very stimulating discussion, as well as Christopher Peacocke, Sven Rosenkranz and Crispin Wright for reading through a later version and providing me with extremely useful feedback (and thank Sven one more time for a challenging last-minute conversation). I am also grateful to an anonymous referee for criticisms of a yet later version that led to many improvements, and to the editor of this special issue Gabriel Uzquiano for inviting me to contribute to the issue, for his comments on the paper and for his support and patience throughout the process. At different stages during the writing of the paper, I have benefitted from an AHRC Doctoral Fellowship, from the FP7 Marie Curie Intra-European Research Fellowship 301493 on A Non-Contractive Theory of Naive Semantic Properties: Logical Developments and Metaphysical Foundations (NTNSP) and from the FCT Research Fellowship IF/01202/2013 on Tolerance and Instability: The Substructure of Cognitions, Transitions and Collections (TI), as well as from partial funds from the project CONSOLIDER-INGENIO 2010 CSD2009-00056 of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation on Philosophy of Perspectival Thoughts and Facts (PERSP), from the project FFI201125626 of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation on Reference, Self-Reference and Empirical Data and from the project FFI2012-35026 of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competition on The Makings of Truth: Nature, Extent, and Applications of Truthmaking.
منابع مشابه
A Classical Solution to the Paradox of Knowability *
After introducing semantic anti-realism and the paradox of knowability, the paper offers a reconstruction of the anti-realist argument from understanding. The proposed reconstruction validates an unrestricted principle to the effect that truth requires the existence of a certain kind of “demonstration”. The paper shows that that principle fails to imply the problematic instances of the original...
متن کاملThe Knowability Argument and the Syntactic Type-Theoretic Approach
Recently, there have been some attempts to block the Knowability Paradox and other modal paradoxes by adopting a type-theoretic framework in which knowledge and necessity are regarded as typed predicates. The main problem with this approach is that when these notions are simultaneously treated as predicates, a new kind of paradox appears. I claim that avoiding this paradox either by weakening t...
متن کاملSundholm’s Paradox of Knowability: A Novel Paradox?
In this paper I take a closer look at a recently published paradox by Göran Sundholm involving the notion of knowability. I point out that this paradox is not a novel, genuine paradox, but rather an important variant of the Knower Paradox. I briefly discuss further variations of the Knower Paradox, and in a final section I try to show that it is not unproblematic to assume that knowability is f...
متن کاملThe Knowability Paradox: does logic come before metaphysics?
The Knowability Paradox is a logical argument which states that if all truths are knowable, then all truths are actually known. In 1963 Frederich Fitch published ‘A Logical Analysis of Some Value Concepts’[3]. This brief article appeared on the Journal of Symbolic Logic and it immediately became a classic of philosophical logic. It is in this paper that Fitch presented the Knowability Paradox, ...
متن کاملWhy Knowledge Should Not Be Typed: An Argument against the Type Solution to the Knowability Paradox
The Knowability Paradox is a logical argument to the effect that, if there are truths not actually known, then there are unknowable truths. Recently, Alexander Paseau and Bernard Linsky have independently suggested a possible way to counter this argument by typing knowledge. In this article, we argue against their proposal that if one abstracts from other possible independent considerations sup...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015